FlunesUse case · Product & stakeholders
Feature requests from stakeholders, captured in GitHub
Ideas from PMs, founders, ops, and support arrive in Slack threads and meetings, then evaporate. Flunes gives stakeholders one link to submit a request; each becomes a clean GitHub issue in the right repo, so feature ideas live where your team plans the work.
One place for ideas, not five channels
Instead of mining Slack, email, and meeting notes, point stakeholders at a single link. Their request lands as a structured GitHub issue, labeled and linked back to the original context.
Stakeholders stay in the loop
Submitters can follow status and reply by email or on a status page, no GitHub account, and they're notified when the request ships, without pinging engineering.
Requests live with the work
A separate idea inbox creates a second list nobody reconciles. Flunes skips that. Each request becomes a GitHub issue in the repo where your engineers already plan, triage, and ship, so feature requests from stakeholders sit in the same backlog as bugs and tasks. You assign, label, and close them with the tools your team uses every day. There is no extra board to check and no syncing step. Flunes does not run a roadmap or a voting view on top; the issue you create is the single record everyone works from.
The context comes with it
An idea without its origin is hard to act on weeks later. Every issue Flunes opens keeps the parts that matter: who submitted it, the request in their own words, a link back to the original message, and any screenshots they attached. Apply your own labels at intake so requests sort by area or priority right away. When an engineer picks it up, they can see exactly what was asked and follow up with the person who asked, instead of reconstructing a conversation from memory or a buried Slack thread.
Intake, not a voting board
A public roadmap with upvotes suits a broad user base weighing in on direction. Stakeholder requests are different. They come from a known, smaller group whose ideas you want triaged privately and turned into work, not ranked by a crowd. Flunes is built for that shape: a private link collects plain text and optional screenshots, and each submission lands as a clean GitHub issue your team prioritizes. It is not a feedback widget on your site and not a voting portal. If you need crowd voting, pair it with a dedicated board instead.
FAQ
Is this a roadmap or voting tool?
No. Flunes is intake, not a public roadmap. Requests become GitHub issues your team prioritizes in GitHub. If you want a public voting portal, a feedback board like Canny fits better.
Do stakeholders need GitHub?
No. They submit and follow up through a private link with no GitHub account.